287(g) in Florida: What It Means When Local Police Help Enforce Immigration Law
Immigration enforcement in Florida has shifted in a way that does not always make headlines: a growing share of it now runs through state and local police, not federal officers alone. Recent government data, released through public-records litigation, helps show how. Here is a calm, factual look at what the numbers say, what the legal mechanism behind them — known as "287(g)" — actually is, and what it means in practical terms.
Speak with the AttorneyWhat the data shows
Immigration-related arrests in Florida rose sharply in 2025. According to records obtained by the Deportation Data Project (UC Berkeley) through Freedom of Information Act requests and reported by WUSF, there were 20,629 immigration-related arrests in the state between January 20 and October 15, 2025 — roughly 10% of the national total, second only to Texas. That averages about 77 arrests per day, up from roughly 20 per day a year earlier.
Two further points stand out. First, a substantial share of those arrested had no criminal record beyond an immigration matter — about a quarter, according to the same dataset. Nationally, TRAC at Syracuse University reported that, as of early April 2026, about 70% of people in ICE detention had no criminal conviction. Second, an analysis by the American Immigration Council found that the share of Florida immigration arrests carried out through a 287(g) program rose from 13% in 2024 to 29% in the first two months of 2026.
What 287(g) actually is
"287(g)" refers to a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act, added in 1996, that lets ICE enter written agreements delegating certain immigration-enforcement functions to state and local officers, under ICE's supervision. ICE currently uses three models:
- Jail Enforcement Model: trained local officers identify and process people who are already in their jail on criminal charges.
- Warrant Service Officer Model: local officers are authorized to serve ICE administrative warrants on people already in their custody. This model does not authorize officers to question people about their immigration status.
- Task Force Model: local officers may exercise limited immigration authority during routine duties — for example, asking about status during a traffic stop or checkpoint — and share information with ICE, which decides the next steps. This model was revived in 2025 after being discontinued in 2012.
Why Florida stands out
Florida has signed more 287(g) agreements than any other state. By early 2026, all 67 county sheriffs' offices participated — the result of a state law enacted in February 2025 requiring county detention facilities to enter these agreements. According to the Florida Sheriffs Association, Florida became the only state where every county has both Warrant Service Officer and Task Force Model agreements in place. Nationally, ICE reported 1,412 active 287(g) agreements as of mid-February 2026, most of them signed during 2025.
What this means in practical terms
The practical effect is that, in Florida, ordinary contact with local law enforcement — a traffic stop, a call for service, or a booking into a county jail — is more likely than before to intersect with immigration enforcement. That does not mean every encounter leads to immigration consequences. It means the pathways between local policing and immigration custody are more connected than they were a few years ago.
For anyone with a pending immigration case, a prior removal order, or an unresolved status question, that connection is worth understanding in advance rather than during an emergency. What happens after an immigration hold or arrest — including whether a person may be eligible for bond or for relief in immigration court — depends heavily on the specific facts and history of the case.
If you have questions about how your own situation fits into this landscape, that is a conversation to have with an immigration attorney — ideally before a problem arises, not after.
Request a ConsultationThis article is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. It describes general enforcement trends and law as of June 2026; immigration policy and data change quickly, and how the law applies depends on the specific facts of each case. Consult a qualified immigration attorney about your situation. This website is attorney advertising.
Sources
- Deportation Data Project (UC Berkeley) — ICE arrest records obtained via FOIA, deportationdata.org.
- WUSF / NPR, There were 20,000+ ICE arrests in Florida last year. Here's a closer look (Mar. 10, 2026), wusf.org.
- TRAC (Syracuse University), Immigration Detention Quick Facts (data as of Apr. 2026), tracreports.org.
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Delegation of Immigration Authority — Section 287(g), ice.gov.
- Florida Sheriffs Association, 287(g) Compliance in All County Jails, flsheriffs.org.
- NPR, Little-used ICE agreements with local police have exploded under Trump (Feb. 17, 2026), npr.org.
- American Immigration Council, New ICE Arrest Statistics… (Apr. 17, 2026) — analysis of the Deportation Data Project dataset; advocacy organization, cited for the 287(g) share figure, americanimmigrationcouncil.org.